Pulsed Detonation Space Propulsion System
**Concept: Pulsed Detonation Space Propulsion System with Solar Energy Harvesting**
### **1. Principle of Operation**
The proposed system utilizes pulsed detonation of HHO gas (a stoichiometric mix of hydrogen and oxygen) for thrust, combined with solar energy harvesting to generate and detonate the gas. Each detonation provides a small impulse, cumulatively accelerating the spacecraft in the vacuum of space, where no friction opposes motion.
### **2. Key Components**
- **HHO Detonation Chamber**: A combustion chamber where small quantities (e.g., 10 mL) of HHO gas are ignited in rapid succession.
- **Electrolysis System**: Splits water into H₂ and O₂ using solar energy.
- **High-Frequency Ignition System**: Triggers detonations at precise intervals.
- **Solar Photovoltaic Array**: Large panels to collect solar radiation, providing energy for electrolysis and onboard systems.
- **Propellant Storage**: Tanks for storing water and compressed HHO gas.
---
### **3. Physics and Calculations**
#### **Detonation Velocity and Thrust**
- **Detonation velocity of HHO**: ~1,400–1,500 m/s (speed of the shockwave).
- **Exhaust velocity (effective)**: Assumed equal to detonation velocity for simplicity: **1,400 m/s**.
- **Specific impulse (Isp)**:
\[
I_{\text{sp}} = \frac{V_e}{g_0} = \frac{1,400}{9.81} \approx 143 \text{ seconds}.
\]
Comparable to low-end chemical rockets but less efficient than ion thrusters.
#### **Delta-V per Detonation**
- **Mass of 10 mL HHO**: ~5.35 × 10⁻⁶ kg (at STP).
- **Impulse per detonation**:
\[
\Delta v = \frac{m_{\text{propellant}}}{m_{\text{spacecraft}}} \cdot V_e.
\]
For a 1,000 kg spacecraft:
\[
\Delta v = \frac{5.35 \times 10^{-6}}{1,000} \cdot 1,400 \approx 7.5 \times 10^{-6} \text{ m/s per detonation}.
\]
- **Detonations needed for 1,000 m/s**:
\[
\frac{1,000}{7.5 \times 10^{-6}} \approx 133 \text{ million detonations}.
\]
#### **Energy and Propellant Requirements**
- **Energy for electrolysis**: ~286 kJ/mol of H₂O. For 10 mL HHO (~0.008 g H₂O):
\[
\text{Energy/detonation} \approx 127 \text{ J}.
\]
- **Solar panel area**: At 20% efficiency and 1,360 W/m² solar flux:
\[
\text{Power} = 1,360 \times 0.2 = 272 \text{ W/m²}.
\]
To produce 127 J every 0.5 seconds:
\[
\text{Required area} = \frac{127}{272 \times 0.5} \approx 0.93 \text{ m²}.
\]
- **Water consumption for 1,000 m/s**: ~1,068 kg (exceeding a 1,000 kg spacecraft’s dry mass).
---
### **4. Challenges**
1. **Propellant Mass**: Storing enough water for long missions is impractical without in-situ resource utilization (e.g., asteroid mining).
2. **Energy Demands**: Solar panels become ineffective far from the Sun; nuclear power may be needed for deep space.
3. **Engine Durability**: Rapid detonations stress materials, requiring advanced heat-resistant alloys.
4. **Scalability**: Thrust is minimal (~0.016 N/m² of solar panel), necessitating massive arrays for meaningful acceleration.
---
### **5. Innovations and Improvements**
- **Hybrid Systems**: Combine with ion thrusters for higher Isp.
- **In-Situ Resource Utilization**: Extract water from asteroids or lunar ice.
- **Nuclear Power**: Replace solar with radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTGs) for outer solar system missions.
- **Magnetic Nozzles**: Direct detonation products more efficiently to boost effective exhaust velocity.
---
### **6. Conclusion**
While the concept leverages valid physics (conservation of momentum and pulsed propulsion), practical limitations in energy, propellant storage, and engine durability hinder feasibility. Advances in material science, energy harvesting, and in-situ resource utilization could make this a viable supplement to existing propulsion technologies, particularly for small satellites or near-Earth missions.
Comments
Post a Comment